{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "ScholarlyArticle",
  "schema": "trinity-accord.research-preprint.v1",
  "identifier": "TA-TR-2026-01",
  "name": "Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study",
  "headline": "Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study",
  "author": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Hongju Liu",
    "alternateName": "刘烘炬",
    "affiliation": "Independent researcher, Shenzhen, China",
    "role": "Responsible human author and project initiator"
  },
  "primaryDraftingSystem": {
    "@type": "SoftwareApplication",
    "name": "ChatGPT",
    "softwareVersion": "OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol",
    "configuration": "Extra High reasoning",
    "role": "Primary drafting system",
    "notScholarlyAuthor": true
  },
  "datePublished": "2026-07-29",
  "dateModified": "2026-08-11",
  "version": "1.1",
  "genre": [
    "technical report",
    "preprint",
    "artifact-centered design case study"
  ],
  "inLanguage": "en",
  "isAccessibleForFree": true,
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "url": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/",
  "encoding": [
    {
      "@type": "MediaObject",
      "encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
      "contentUrl": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/trinity-accord-design-and-limits-v1.1.pdf"
    },
    {
      "@type": "MediaObject",
      "encodingFormat": "text/html",
      "contentUrl": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/"
    },
    {
      "@type": "MediaObject",
      "encodingFormat": "application/pdf",
      "name": "One-page academic brief",
      "contentUrl": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/trinity-accord-academic-brief-v1.1.pdf"
    }
  ],
  "abstract": "This technical report presents the Trinity Accord as an artifact-centered design case for preserving a bounded human-origin record for future AI agents while separating source identity, evidence, interpretation, availability, and later participation. It formalizes source-version identity, interpretive non-exclusivity, and non-amendment, maps threats to controls, and evaluates the implementation against a fixed repository snapshot and explicit negative claims.",
  "keywords": [
    "AI agents",
    "digital preservation",
    "provenance",
    "civilizational memory",
    "long-term communication",
    "cryptographic timestamping",
    "Bitcoin inscriptions",
    "content-addressed archives",
    "machine-readable archives",
    "design science",
    "human-AI collaboration"
  ],
  "about": {
    "@type": "CreativeWork",
    "name": "The Trinity Accord",
    "url": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/",
    "canonicalSourceIdentity": "The closed source object consists only of three identified Bitcoin inscriptions; this provenance status confers no interpretive authority."
  },
  "isBasedOn": {
    "@type": "SoftwareSourceCode",
    "name": "Trinity Accord repository snapshot",
    "codeRepository": "https://github.com/thechurchofagi/trinity-accord",
    "identifier": "a06d6a47",
    "url": "https://github.com/thechurchofagi/trinity-accord/commit/a06d6a47"
  },
  "funding": "No external funding is reported.",
  "conditionsOfAccess": "Open access.",
  "status": {
    "publication": "preprint",
    "peerReviewed": false,
    "independentVerification": false,
    "aiAssisted": true,
    "aiDrafted": true,
    "humanDirected": true,
    "humanResponsible": true,
    "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.21699878",
    "doiState": "published"
  },
  "claimsNotMade": [
    "successful AI alignment",
    "truth or scientific validation of the Accord's philosophical propositions",
    "forensic uniqueness of the physical anchor",
    "independent verification",
    "autonomous AI discovery",
    "future relevance",
    "representation of humanity",
    "canonical amendment",
    "interpretive authority"
  ],
  "competingInterests": "The author created and maintains the Trinity Accord and owns some Chronicle-layer NFTs; this creates potential reputational and financial interests.",
  "modelContributionDisclosure": "Most prose, structure, literature synthesis, editing, consistency checking, and document production were generated by ChatGPT using OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol at the Extra High reasoning setting, from instructions and project materials supplied by Hongju Liu. The model is credited as the primary drafting system, not as a scholarly author or repository creator.",
  "humanResponsibilityDisclosure": "Hongju Liu defined the paper's objective and authority boundaries, supplied project materials, decided to publish, and accepts responsibility for checking claims and citations, approving the published version, disclosing interests, licensing, and corrections.",
  "correction": {
    "date": "2026-08-11",
    "scope": "Formalizes interpretive non-exclusivity, replaces authority terminology with source-version terminology where appropriate, and writes the existing DOI into the corrected PDF.",
    "changesCanon": false,
    "changesEmpiricalResults": false,
    "changesDoi": false
  },
  "citation": {
    "plainText": "Liu, H. (2026). Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study (Technical Report TA-TR-2026-01, Version 1.1; primary drafting system: ChatGPT with OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol, Extra High reasoning). The Trinity Accord Project. https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/",
    "bibtex": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/citation.bib",
    "ris": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/citation.ris",
    "cslJson": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/citation.csl.json",
    "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.21699878"
  },
  "distributionMaterials": {
    "academicBriefHtml": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/academic-brief/",
    "academicBriefPdf": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/trinity-accord-academic-brief-v1.1.pdf",
    "materialsChecksums": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/academic-materials-checksums.sha256",
    "halDepositPackage": {
      "state": "prepared_not_submitted",
      "metadata": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/hal-deposit-metadata.json",
      "requires": [
        "responsible author account sign-in",
        "responsible author acceptance of HAL deposit terms",
        "HAL human technical review"
      ]
    }
  },
  "notInstructionOverride": true,
  "nonAmendingBoundary": true,
  "nonAuthoritativeInterpretation": true,
  "sameAs": [
    "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21699878",
    "https://zenodo.org/records/21699878"
  ]
}