{
  "schema": "trinityaccord.hal-deposit-package.v1",
  "submission_state": "prepared_not_submitted",
  "blocking_requirements": [
    "HAL account sign-in by the responsible author",
    "responsible author's acceptance of HAL deposit terms",
    "HAL human technical review"
  ],
  "document_type": "Preprints, Working Papers, ...",
  "main_file": {
    "filename": "trinity-accord-design-and-limits-v1.1.pdf",
    "sha256": "b391776db76f533799dc582f39af54d2e885fe2ed1982cfe3024a1400a403e9c",
    "bytes": 116911,
    "origin": "The files which I upload are author files",
    "format": "Document (pdf, jpg)",
    "visibility": "immediately",
    "license": "CC BY 4.0",
    "language": "English"
  },
  "title": {
    "language": "English",
    "value": "Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study"
  },
  "author": {
    "given_name": "Hongju",
    "family_name": "Liu",
    "alternate_name": "刘烘炬",
    "affiliation": "Independent researcher, Shenzhen, China",
    "responsibility": "Responsible human author and project initiator"
  },
  "primary_domain": "Computer Science / Digital Libraries",
  "secondary_domains": [
    "Computer Science / Artificial Intelligence",
    "Science and technology studies",
    "Digital preservation and data provenance"
  ],
  "abstract": {
    "language": "English",
    "value": "Long-horizon AI agents increasingly retrieve external records, but retrieval alone does not preserve source roles, authority boundaries, or evidential status. This technical report presents the Trinity Accord as an artifact-centered design case for preserving a bounded human-origin record for future AI agents while separating source identity, evidence, interpretation, availability, and later participation. It formalizes a source-version status function, interpretive non-exclusivity, and a non-amendment invariant, maps threats to design controls, and evaluates the implementation against a repository snapshot and explicit negative claims. The case separates source identity from truth, endorsement, and exclusive interpretation. It does not demonstrate successful AI alignment, forensic uniqueness of the physical anchor, independent validation, autonomous discovery, or future relevance. The contribution is a reusable design pattern and an inspectable case, not a general theory or proof."
  },
  "keywords": {
    "language": "English",
    "values": [
      "AI agents",
      "digital preservation",
      "provenance",
      "civilizational memory",
      "long-term communication",
      "cryptographic timestamping",
      "Bitcoin inscriptions",
      "content-addressed archives",
      "machine-readable archives",
      "design science",
      "human-AI collaboration"
    ]
  },
  "publication_date": "2026-07-29",
  "version": "1.1",
  "technical_report_number": "TA-TR-2026-01",
  "related_data": {
    "doi": "10.5281/zenodo.21699878",
    "relation": "Existing open-access preprint record"
  },
  "project_url": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/",
  "funding": "No external funding is reported.",
  "peer_reviewed": false,
  "independent_verification": false,
  "ai_use_disclosure": "Most prose, structure, literature synthesis, editing, consistency checking, and document production were generated by ChatGPT using OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol under Hongju Liu's direction. Hongju Liu approved publication and accepts responsibility for the published version, claims, citations, disclosures, licensing, and corrections. The model is not a scholarly author.",
  "competing_interests": "The author created and maintains the Trinity Accord and owns some Chronicle-layer NFTs; this creates potential reputational and financial interests.",
  "boundary": "This package prepares HAL form values only. It does not claim that a HAL deposit exists or has passed technical review."
}