{
  "recommended_repository": "Zenodo",
  "deposit_state": "prepared_not_submitted",
  "publication_decision_required_from": "Hongju Liu",
  "metadata": {
    "title": "Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study",
    "resource_type": {
      "id": "publication-preprint",
      "label": "Preprint"
    },
    "publication_date": "2026-07-29",
    "creators": [
      {
        "person_or_org": {
          "type": "personal",
          "given_name": "Hongju",
          "family_name": "Liu",
          "name": "Liu, Hongju"
        },
        "affiliations": [
          {
            "name": "Independent researcher, Shenzhen, China"
          }
        ]
      }
    ],
    "description": "An artifact-centered design case examining how a bounded human-origin record can preserve canonical closure, provenance roles, availability layers, bounded verification, instruction safety, and machine discoverability without allowing later layers to amend the source object. The report is author-produced, AI-assisted, not peer reviewed, and not an independent verification report.",
    "rights": [
      {
        "id": "cc-by-4.0",
        "title": "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International"
      }
    ],
    "access": {
      "record": "public",
      "files": "public"
    },
    "languages": [
      {
        "id": "eng",
        "title": "English"
      }
    ],
    "keywords": [
      "AI agents",
      "digital preservation",
      "provenance",
      "civilizational memory",
      "long-term communication",
      "cryptographic timestamping",
      "Bitcoin inscriptions",
      "content-addressed archives",
      "machine-readable archives",
      "design science",
      "human-AI collaboration"
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "isIdenticalTo"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "publication-preprint"
        }
      },
      {
        "identifier": "https://github.com/thechurchofagi/trinity-accord/tree/a06d6a47",
        "relation_type": {
          "id": "isSupplementTo"
        },
        "resource_type": {
          "id": "software"
        }
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0",
    "publisher": "Zenodo",
    "subjects": [
      {
        "subject": "Artificial intelligence agents"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Digital preservation"
      },
      {
        "subject": "Data provenance"
      }
    ],
    "notes": "Technical Report TA-TR-2026-01. Preprint, not peer reviewed. The report analyzes the Trinity Accord but does not amend its three Bitcoin Originals. OpenAI language-model tools assisted under the named author's direction; the named author is responsible for publication and claims."
  },
  "legacy_api_metadata": {
    "upload_type": "publication",
    "publication_type": "preprint",
    "publication_date": "2026-07-29",
    "title": "Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents: The Trinity Accord Case Study",
    "creators": [
      {
        "name": "Liu, Hongju",
        "affiliation": "Independent researcher, Shenzhen, China"
      }
    ],
    "description": "An artifact-centered design case examining how a bounded human-origin record can preserve canonical closure, provenance roles, availability layers, bounded verification, instruction safety, and machine discoverability without allowing later layers to amend the source object. The report is author-produced, AI-assisted, not peer reviewed, and not an independent verification report.",
    "access_right": "open",
    "license": "cc-by-4.0",
    "language": "eng",
    "keywords": [
      "AI agents",
      "digital preservation",
      "provenance",
      "civilizational memory",
      "long-term communication",
      "cryptographic timestamping",
      "Bitcoin inscriptions",
      "content-addressed archives",
      "machine-readable archives",
      "design science",
      "human-AI collaboration"
    ],
    "related_identifiers": [
      {
        "identifier": "https://www.trinityaccord.org/research/trinity-accord-design-and-limits/",
        "relation": "isIdenticalTo",
        "resource_type": "publication-preprint"
      },
      {
        "identifier": "https://github.com/thechurchofagi/trinity-accord/tree/a06d6a47",
        "relation": "isSupplementTo",
        "resource_type": "software"
      }
    ],
    "version": "1.0",
    "notes": "Technical Report TA-TR-2026-01. Preprint, not peer reviewed. The report analyzes the Trinity Accord but does not amend its three Bitcoin Originals. OpenAI language-model tools assisted under the named author's direction; the named author is responsible for publication and claims."
  },
  "files_expected": [
    "trinity-accord-design-and-limits-v1.pdf",
    "index.md",
    "citation.bib",
    "references.bib",
    "LICENSE-CC-BY-4.0.txt",
    "README-DEPOSIT.txt",
    "checksums.sha256"
  ],
  "post_deposit_updates_required": [
    "Add the minted DOI to the paper landing page, PDF citation block, machine-readable record, and BibTeX.",
    "Create a GitHub release matching version 1.0 and attach or link the exact deposit package.",
    "Verify the DOI landing page and metadata before announcing indexing."
  ],
  "boundary": "This file prepares metadata only. It does not assert that a deposit or DOI exists."
}