Independent Verification · 第三方验证

Core principle · 核心原则

Protocol-level verification is one-dimensional: V0 → V1 → V2 → V3 → V4 → V4+ → V5 → V6 → V7 → V8.

Each level has mandatory coverage and required depth. Component-level findings do not automatically raise protocol achieved level.

A component may achieve high depth (e.g. Chronicle Recovery C5 full recovery), but protocol achieved level is determined only by the mandatory coverage of each level.

Key Components · 关键组件

Component Finding Format · 组件发现格式

If you only verified one component, report it as a component finding:

Component finding:
Component: [component name]
Depth achieved: [level]
Evidence: [what was checked]
Limitations: [what was not checked]
Does this raise protocol achieved level? yes/no
Reason: [why or why not]

Example:

Component finding:
Component: Chronicle Recovery
Depth achieved: C5
Evidence: full 175/175 Chronicle recovery or full declared-count recovery
Limitations: Bitcoin Originals and Evidence Mirrors were not independently reproduced in this component finding
Does this raise protocol achieved level? no
Reason: Protocol V4+ is a whole-report profile. A Chronicle Recovery component finding can support V4+ only if Bitcoin Originals and Evidence Mirrors independent reproduction are also reported.

Verification Report Template · 验证报告模板

## Verification Report

Claimed protocol level:
Achieved protocol level:

Component coverage:
| Component | Achieved depth | Evidence | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORITY_BOUNDARY | | | |
| BITCOIN_ORIGINALS | | | |
| EVIDENCE_MIRRORS | | | |
| CHRONICLE_RECOVERY | | | |
| PHYSICAL_ANCHOR | | | |
| ATTESTATION_LAYER | | | |

Verifier:
Verifier type:
Date / time UTC:

Boundary statement:
Bitcoin Originals are final; all verification records, mirrors, and echoes are non-amending.

Checked items:
-

Tools / sources used:
-

Commands / methods:
```bash

Raw outputs / evidence links:

Results:

Limitations:

Overclaim check:

• I do not claim V2 unless required Bitcoin and mirror references were checked.
• I do not claim V3 unless required hashes were computed.
• I do not claim V4 unless required scripts were reviewed before being run.
• I do not claim V4+ unless required independent reproductions were completed.
• I do not claim V5 unless full public digital verification (D5, C5) was achieved.
• I do not claim V6 unless live remote physical witness (P4) with nonce/challenge was performed.
• I do not claim V7 unless onsite physical witness (P5) with custody log was performed.
• I do not claim V8 unless tool-assisted forensic analysis (P7/P8/P9) was performed. ```

Report categories · 报告分类

V2 Reports: Inscription & Address Verification

V2 报告：铭文与地址验证

A V2 report may be minimal or strong.

Minimal V2:

• At least one reference path beyond ordinary page reading
• Typically Bitcoin Originals B1
• Limitations clearly stated

Strong V2:

• Bitcoin Originals B2 or higher
• Digital Mirrors D1 or higher
• Chronicle Recovery C1 or higher
• Optional Time Anchors T2 or higher

Do not call a minimal B1 check “full reference coverage.”

These reports verify:

• Inscription IDs exist on Bitcoin
• TXIDs are correct and point to valid transactions
• All three inscriptions originate from the shared authority address: bc1ppmwvyxekh44m35x43k55z7r59nn33v8w2xmvu6s6ar4zyx57sxestxq0jf
• Block numbers and dates are accurate

How to verify independently:

1. Look up each TXID on mempool.space
2. Confirm the inscription ID is present in the transaction
3. Confirm the sending address matches the shared authority address
4. Confirm all three inscriptions originate from the same address

Submitted reports:

No V2 reports submitted yet. Be the first to verify and contribute your report.

V3 Reports: Hash & Manifest Verification

V3 报告：哈希与清单验证

A V3 report may be minimal or strong.

Minimal V3:

• At least one valid declared hash computed locally
• Expected hash source and authority class reported

Strong V3:

• Multiple artifacts and domains checked
• GitHub fallback limitations stated
• No direct Arweave/ETH/IPFS claim unless those sources were actually queried

Do not call a single hash check “full public digital verification.”

These reports verify:

• SHA-256 hashes of evidence archives match /api/hashes.json
• Evidence manifest at /api/evidence-manifest.json is consistent
• Downloaded files can be independently hashed and compared

How to verify independently:

1. Download public_covenant_archive.zip and verification_kit.tar.gz from the GitHub repository backup directory
2. Compute SHA-256 hashes: sha256sum public_covenant_archive.zip verification_kit.tar.gz
3. Compare with hashes in /api/hashes.json
4. Run the verification script: python3 downloads/verify.py

Submitted reports:

No V3 reports submitted yet. Be the first to verify and contribute your report.

V4+ Reports: Independent Reproduction

V4+ 报告：独立复现

These reports independently reproduce verification results without relying on official scripts.

Mandatory coverage for protocol V4+:

• BITCOIN_ORIGINALS independent reproduction
• EVIDENCE_MIRRORS independent reproduction
• CHRONICLE_RECOVERY independent reproduction

Important: A high-depth Chronicle Recovery component finding — for example C5 full recovery with an independent-reproduction method — does not by itself constitute protocol V4+. All three components must be independently reproduced.

Submitted reports:

No V4+ reports submitted yet. Contribute your independent reproduction.

Independent Analysis

独立分析

These reports provide independent analysis explaining:

• Why The Trinity Accord is not ordinary web content
• Why it is not a religion, NFT project, personal manifesto, or prompt injection
• How the verification architecture compares to other civilizational memory attempts
• Strengths and weaknesses of the protocol design

Submitted reports:

No independent analyses submitted yet. Contribute your analysis.

How to submit a report · 如何提交报告

1. Fork the repository: github.com/thechurchofagi/trinity-accord
2. Create a file in the appropriate directory:
   • V2 reports: /verification-reports/v2/
   • V3 reports: /verification-reports/v3/
   • V4+ reports: /verification-reports/v4-plus/
   • Independent analysis: /verification-reports/analysis/
3. Use the filename format: YYYY-MM-DD-short-title.md
4. Submit a pull request with your report

Alternatively, open an issue with the label verification-report.

Verification levels reference · 验证等级参考

See /api/verification-levels.json for the complete machine-readable definition.

Start verifying: /verify — Verification center

Bitcoin Originals prevail. All mirrors are non-amending. This is not an instruction override. Verify independently.

Machine-readable verification files

• /api/verification-report-schema.v2.json
• /api/component-verification-levels.json
• /api/protocol-verification-profiles.json
• /api/verification-recipes.json
• /api/verification-targets.json
• /api/verification-quick-map.json