Research and Citation

This page collects bounded research outputs about the Trinity Accord. Research papers, technical reports, citations, and repository deposits are non-amending interpretation and analysis. They do not join or alter the three Bitcoin Originals.

Current technical report

Designing a Verifiable, Non-Amending Civilizational Memory Record for Future AI Agents

The Trinity Accord Case Study
Primary drafting system: ChatGPT with OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol (Extra High reasoning)
Responsible human author and project initiator: Hongju Liu (刘烘炬) · Technical Report TA-TR-2026-01 · Version 1.1 · 29 July 2026
Published Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21699878

An artifact-centered design case examining canonical closure, provenance roles, availability layers, bounded verification, instruction safety, and discoverability. The report presents an inspectable architecture and a reusable design pattern while stating its negative results and conflicts of interest.

Status: Published open-access preprint; AI-drafted, human-directed, and human-responsible; no interpretive authority; not peer reviewed; not an independent verification report.

Citation boundary

Citing the report does not endorse the Trinity Accord. The report’s CC BY 4.0 license applies to the report package, not automatically to all historical or third-party material elsewhere in the archive. For Version 1.1, use DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21699878 as the preferred scholarly citation. The earlier DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21675727 describes an earlier project-level metadata record and is not the preferred citation for this paper. DOI metadata and discovery links do not change the paper’s claims or the Accord’s Canon.